Please set your LearnWPT Password now. Your username is the email address you joined with. Having trouble? Email us at



To be more aggressive or not to be. That is the question

  • Doornumber7 (Atlanta, GA)

Hey Rizen, I used to have a reputation as a "more than" aggressive tournament player because I would always raise first-in at least 5-6x times the BB which often created tension and a certain level of social backlash from my fellow players Lol. Since I was raising 5-6x pre-flop, that meant my continuation bet of 2/3 pot was putting my opponents to "more than" meaningful decisions. Consequently, players would think twice about entering a hand against me thus reducing variance (or so it seemed). Now that I've been on this site awhile, I've noticed that I've settled down more because I understand the game and it's nuances better. As a result, I'm only raising first-in 3-4BB's if that is getting the job done instead of 5-6BB's regardless.

When I used to play in tournaments and was on my A-game and winning overwhelmingly uncontested pots, I found that playing more than aggressive generated a lot of add-on benefits. For example; Players checked around to me more often and that's especially cool when I'm in the blinds; Players would raise less often first-in when they had premium hands and I was in late position; If they did raise, I knew they had a very good hand. In addition, I found that when I put weaker players to more than meaningful decisions, their body language often gave away their hand strength. Last but not least, when I'm winning a lot of uncontested pots I find that I can get away with altering my first-in bet sizes or raises in order to isolate players I have a skill advantage over. I would often do this when I had good spec hands and chances were good I could induce a fold or a tell. If they didn't fold, at least I knew where I stood.

What I'm trying to say that I know more I've started playing less aggressively and more systematically. I'm still putting players to meaningful decisions but to a lesser degree. As a result, I'm not as feared at the table and I'm not getting as many free cards or physical reads from my opponents which makes a huge difference! What's worse, lately I've been getting run over by aggressive players that play like I used to play and those guys are the ones winning the tournaments.

I'm seriously thinking about going back to playing more aggressively because I reached more final tables that way and had a lot more fun along the way.

Since you're my valued coach, what words of wisdom can you share with me to help me decide? Lol

Answers are only available to members.